‘Postcode lottery’ over high-rise fire response, says union

High-rise residents face a “postcode lottery” over how many firefighters would be sent to their building in the event of a blaze, a union has said.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Three years after the Grenfell Tower fire, the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) say that “many brigades would not be able to mobilise anywhere near the scale” that was needed to tackle the west London blaze that killed 72 people.

Read More
Warning over unsafe cars on the road due to MOT exemption.

In London, up to 10 trucks and an aerial lift will be sent as standard if the building is clad, however in North Wales the number is just two.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad
In Lancashire, four fire engines and an aerial platform are sent as standard to a fire at a high rise buildingIn Lancashire, four fire engines and an aerial platform are sent as standard to a fire at a high rise building
In Lancashire, four fire engines and an aerial platform are sent as standard to a fire at a high rise building

Brigades in the capital, south east and south west on average send more resources to high-rise buildings than those in the Midlands and north of England, Wales and Northern Ireland, FBU data suggests.

Kent, Surrey, East Sussex and West Sussex forces, as well as those in the Home Counties, Devon and Cornwall would all send at least six engines and an airborne platform to a high-rise fire.

Meanwhile, in Merseyside, Lancashire, South Yorkshire and Humberside among others, it is just four and an aerial platform.

The FBU general secretary described the situation as “shocking” and “a chilling warning to the Prime Minister”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Matt Wrack said: “Lives in London and the south east are worth no more than the rest of the country, yet different regions have drastically different standards.”

He added: “The loss of 72 lives three years ago was deeply traumatic.

“But there is a good chance that the next Grenfell will be outside London, in an area where fewer resources are mobilised to a fire, and the loss of life could be worse still.”