What Lancashire residents should do if they have an underlying health condition and think they should be prioritised for Covid vaccine

Lancashire residents with an underlying health condition that they believe should see them prioritised for the Covid vaccine have been reminded that they can make an individual case for getting earlier access to the jab.

Thursday, 4th March 2021, 4:32 pm
Updated Thursday, 4th March 2021, 10:22 pm

The issue was raised at a recent Lancashire County Council meeting where there was a call for patients suffering from ME or chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) to be included in group 6 on the vaccine priority list.

That cohort of patients, aged between 16 and 64, are those considered to be in a “clinical risk group”. They are currently being vaccinated in the latest phase of the rollout, ahead of the general 60-64-year-old population and the remaining younger age groups yet to come.

Read More

Read More
'Big push' to persuade Lancashire's vaccine hesitant to have their Covid jab

Sign up to our public interest bulletins - get the latest news on the Coronavirus

Sign up to our public interest bulletins - get the latest news on the Coronavirus

People with certain underlying health conditions are currently being vaccinated

The priority order for vaccines was drawn up by the independent Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), which also published a list of conditions that would put someone at high clinical risk should they contract Covid-19. It includes diagnoses that would classify them as having chronic respiratory, heart, kidney, liver or neurological disease.

The County Hall meeting heard that while the JCVI had not included ME or CFS in its examples of conditions for vaccine priority, the committee had recently stressed that their list was not “exhaustive”.

Cabinet member for health and wellbeing Shaun Turner, said: “The JCVI has emphasised that...GPs should - not can - apply their clinical judgement when it comes to patients who have underlying health conditions that are likely to be exacerbated by Covid-19 infection.

“This means that doctors cannot simply state that they are unable to place someone with ME or chronic fatigue syndrome into group 6 because the JCVI does not allow them to do so.

“They should be applying their clinical judgement in this situation and taking each circumstance into account.”

Pressed by County Cllr Gina Dowding, who asked the original question, on whether he would continue to push for “fairness for people who are overlooked”, County Cllr Turner revealed that he was regularly contacted by residents regarding vaccine priority.

“Clearly, it’s a clinical decision and...I’ll continue to lobby that GPs use their clinical judgement - that they have been told by the JCVI that they can use - and continue to look at all groups and consider them on a clinical level,” he added.

The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) approached the NHS in Lancashire about the issue and a spokesperson said: “The NHS is currently vaccinating people in the top seven priority groups identified by the JCVI, which includes individuals who are on the Shielded Patient List and who are at high risk from coronavirus.

“If you think that you are vulnerable and should be on the list, please contact your GP surgery.”

The LDRS understands that GPs across Lancashire are currently receiving high volumes of calls.

The JCVI has prioritised vaccine rollout largely on the basis of age, except for care home residents, frontline health and care workers, the clinically extremely vulnerable or those at clinical risk.

Those considered “extremely clinically vulnerable” - and who have been advised to shield - were vaccinated as part of the first four cohorts who received a jab prior to 15th February.

The JCVI guidance accompanying its list of clinical risk groups states: "The examples...are not exhaustive, and, within these groups, the prescriber should apply clinical judgement to take into account the risk of COVID-19 exacerbating any underlying disease that a patient may have, as well as the risk of serious illness from COVID-19 itself."