Blackpool fans' group questions purpose of FA's investigation into Marvin Ekpiteta's historical tweets

Blackpool’s leading supporters’ group has written to the FA questioning the purpose of their investigation into Marvin Ekpiteta’s historical tweets.

Saturday, 21st May 2022, 9:07 am

Read More

Read More
Jake Daniels publicly backs Marvin Ekpiteta after Blackpool teammate apologises ...

In one of the tweets, the 26-year-old - who was 17 at the time - appeared to support the decision of the Nigerian parliament to outlaw gay marriage.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

In another, Ekpiteta said it was “disgusting” that there were five gay people in the “small village” of Hollyoaks, a fictional soap opera.

After the defender’s past posts came to light, Ekpiteta - whose tweets are now under investigation by the FA - released a swift statement to apologise.

Daniels also responded to offer his support, commenting: “what you said ten years ago at 17 years old doesn’t define the man you are today.”

Blackpool Supporters’ Trust has since penned an open letter on the subject to Debbie Hewitt, the chair of the FA.

Ekpiteta is under investigation over historical tweets he made 10 years ago

“We should acknowledge at the outset that we understand that this is difficult territory for you,” BST said in their statement.

“There have been opportunities in the past for the FA to take a stance on homophobia, but these have not been taken.

“We do understand that taking on powerful vested interests within FIFA and in the Middle East (for example) is not something that can be done easily, or lightly.

“That said, if the press speculation we have read is accurate, then we have to say that in our view Marvin Ekpiteta is an easy and convenient target.

“We have noted suggestions that your interest has been piqued by revelations in a UK tabloid newspaper. If true, this in itself is disappointing.

“At a time when Jake Daniels has managed to inspire a warm and generous response up and down the country, we are sure that we are not alone in wondering about the motivations of the newspaper involved.

“The material that they have published seems calculated to foment discord between the two players in particular and within our football club in general.

“If this is claimed to be to meet a wider public interest, we are struggling to see what that public interest is.

“The material in question is over 10 years old; Marvin has issued a mea culpa and Jake has not only accepted that apology in good faith, but has endorsed Marvin as a valued work colleague.

“We are not sure therefore what purpose an investigation on these narrow grounds would serve, although we accept that it is ultimately for you to decide.

“You are, however, the pre-eminent body managing English football, and as such, in our view, you are under no obligation to conduct your enquiries merely to satisfy the prurient curiosity of the newspaper in question.

“We also feel that your leadership role is such that you should be shaping and leading events in matters such as this, and not merely responding to them.

“If an enquiry is to take place, we hope that you will be setting the terms of reference for it, rather than taking them from others.”

Continuing, BST hope the FA will:

- look carefully at what it is about the culture and working environment at Blackpool FC that gave Jake the confidence to speak out as he did

- assess to what extent there is learning and good practice to be taken from this that other clubs might usefully adapt for their own purposes

- share what you learn with the DCMS, to inform the White Paper that they are currently preparing as part of the fan led review (FLR) process

BST added: “We would be the first to acknowledge the successes that the FA has had in some parts of the equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) sphere. Great progress has been made on racism, and the women’s game is now flourishing.

“But homophobia remains a difficult issue, and we would suggest to you that the fact that Jake Daniels’ case has been so newsworthy and crossed over from sport into wider social awareness, demonstrates that there is still a great deal to be done.

“In that spirit, we hope that any further investigatory work you do with and at Blackpool FC is done from a listening and learning perspective, rather than a disciplinary one.

“We also hope that you will accept that in this instance, it is for the FA to do its fair share of the listening and the learning, and to share it as widely as possible.”