Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

your advert here
Advertise here!
Call 01253 361882 for more information.
 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Shock over Blackpool cancer claims



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 September 2008
MEDICS and patients today said they were not shocked by claims cancer sufferers had a better chance of survival if they lived in more affluent areas.
Figures just released by the Office of National Statistics state cancer patients in poorer areas of the country - particularly in the North of England - have a lower chance of being alive five years after diagnosis.

Its study of primary care trusts found "significantly lower" survival rates for both men and women across a range of cancers in the 62 most deprived areas of the country - including Blackpool, Manchester and Cumbria.

Blackpool's public health report for 2006 showed men in the resort were 18 per cent more likely and females 25 per cent more likely to die from cancer than other parts of the country.

Arif Rajpura, director of public health for Blackpool, said there were three possible reasons for poor cancer survival rates in Blackpool.

He said: "It could be that in more deprived areas, people tend to see their doctor later meaning later diagnosis and the disease is more advanced. We can work on tackling this through education and work to improve screening rates.

"The other factor could be that people don't tend to comply with treatment and another factor could be the fact their general health and well-being is worse - making it harder to fight off any illness."

Dave Myers, who was diagnosed with myeloma - cancer of the plasma cells in the bone marrow - in 2004, is now in remission.

The 70-year-old, who runs The Windsor Hotel in North Shore, said he was not entirely surprised by the news.

He said: "It seems there is something of a lottery in the health service. It's difficult to know why, but there should not be those kinds of discrepancies.

"It's supposed to be a national health service, not a different service for more affluent areas.

"Having said that, the treatment I've received in Blackpool at the Victoria Hospital has been excellent. I have had chemotherapy and stem cell treatment and am doing well. The doctors at the hospital do their best, even if we are not in one of the wealthiest parts of the country."

Dr Paul Kelsey, medical director at Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, said the Government figures were not the most up-to-date as they covered the period 1998 - 2003.

Dr Kelsey, who works in haematology and deals first-hand with cancer patients, said: "It certainly isn't a question of access.

"Since 2003, a lot of improvements have been made in terms of structure, a regional network, better access. We have to ask if patients are presenting early enough."

The full article contains 450 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 September 2008 4:35 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Anwar Horrocks,

06/09/2008 08:59:56
Its not the NHS, its the fact that Blackpool houses some of the vilest pond life known to man, all brought in by the council and hoteliers.
2

Scribb'ler,

Blackpool 06/09/2008 15:58:44
I fail to see the point of printing a report that is FIVE YEARS out of date. Perhaps some-one could enlighten me why this is done?
I have had two different cancers since 2001 and the treatment I have received from Victoria Hospital has been first class.
3

1970tangerine,

blackpool 06/09/2008 22:52:47
Like the hotelier in the report I have Myeloma and I am currently undergoing treatment which hopefully will put me in remission. I have found the treatment, service and dedication of the all the doctors, nurses and staff at 'The Vic' to be nothing but superb, all on the national health I may add. I have of course searched the internet regarding my 'condition' and have found nothing more than what the Doctors are currently prescribing for me and I believe that you have to have faith in what your proffessionals are telling you, yes ask the questions and i am sure you will get an honest answer whether you like it or not, but to get to the point, i do not believe that i could have got better care anywhere else, free or paid for!
4

Frustrated,

St Annes 07/09/2008 09:01:52
Well I went to a friend's funeral on Friday that was diagnosed very late despite having gone to her doctor at the start and kept going back. Bad survival rates can be indicative of many things - blaming patients is not very helpful as how gps, hospitals and patients act all need examining especially with such little information as this report produced.
5

sceptic & dissapointed.,

lancs 07/09/2008 23:38:13
I'm sorry Ive lost heart in the nhs service.My dad was sent hom after bring up blood & told he had a burst ulcer( not in b/pl mind) only 10 mths down the line for them to find it was cancer.JUST MAYBE? if they'd spent a little more time in their diagnosing JUST maybe? he would have had the chance of life.So many other stories I hear of people being misdiagnosed for 12 mths then to find its cancer.f course then the nhs just put it down to cancer killed them, NOTHING about them not diagnosing it for all that time prior to their death.sorry! dissalusioned.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.