Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Broomheads
For 27 years - your Property,
Mortgage and Life Insurance needs
 
 
Saturday, 30th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Blackpool Gazette site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

New £50m plan for Blackpool gateway



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 July 2008
PLANS for a £50m state-of-the-art council office complex on the Talbot Gateway site have been revealed.
The development would see eight current council sites sold and workers relocated to the new development, which, if the plan was to go ahead, would be ready by 2010.

The council say the move is "a critical element of the masterplan to regenerate Blackpool" and "a once in a lifetime opportunity".

It would make up part of the private sector-led gateway development, which would see Bonny Street police station re-located and possibly, as revealed by The Gazette last week, a new Government office created.

Alan Cavill, assistant director of enterprise and business development at Blackpool Council, said: "This is probably the biggest single thing we can do for the town centre.

"There are a few reasons why this is a good idea.

"One is that it will help to ensure the Talbot Gateway project happens.

"Another is that one of the things that will really make the Talbot Gateway work is having a significant number of office workers, who during their lunch hour spend money in the town centre, providing a vital boost for the local economy.

"The third reason is that if we don't change the way we use office space it could actually end up costing us a lot of money."

Mr Cavill said the new complex, if it went ahead, would pay for itself in savings made from getting rid of "Portakabin-like" office buildings that are said to be past their sell-by date.

Progress House on Clifton Road, Westgate House on Squires Gate Lane, Prudential House on Topping Street and an office on South King Street would all go under the scheme.

And Mr Cavill said the public should not be under the illusion that the council was creating a "palatial" complex for them to relax and enjoy themselves in.

"The simple answer to those questions is that it would cost more to stay as we are than it would to move," he said.

The proposal is one of four options put forward to the council for improvements to their offices by London-based property consultant Gensler.

One other option was for the council to stay in its existing offices but that is said to be "poor value for money" with an investment of £72m required to bring the facility up to modern standards.

Another is to lease new offices in the town centre but due to "uncertainty regarding future rent levels" that too is said to be unsuitable.

A third option, to relocate to Progress House is the lowest cost option.

But the report, by director of business services Julian Kearsley, says the "fringe location" on Clifton Road – well out of the town centre – will not provide the "once in a lifetime opportunity" to regenerate the town centre.

The full article contains 481 words and appears in Blackpool Gazette newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 July 2008 7:01 AM
  • Source: Blackpool Gazette
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
2 3 4 5
1

Al3321,

18/07/2008 07:35:57
Another excercise in how to spend the most regeneration money on themselves!!! AS USUAL!!
2

,

18/07/2008 09:26:21
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
3

yorskshireman,

blackpool 18/07/2008 09:45:05
Only thing is you have actually got to build it - not just talk about it or come up with grand plans and little models but actually build something - this seems to be the sticking point in Blackpool and action
4

Seasidesid,

Blackpool 18/07/2008 10:37:14
How will it be ready by 2010, when the Re-Blackpool website states work on the gateway will not commence until 2010.

Also the bowling centre do not have to move until late 2009, more rubbish journalism, Gazette.
5

Successful Hotelier,

Central 18/07/2008 11:01:53
Has the community had any say in this, or have they just took it upon themselves to make the long promised Talbot Gateway for ALL VISITORS AND COMMUNITY TO BENEFIT, a council estate for councillors!
6

Al3321,

18/07/2008 11:16:20
I like the todays vote?? "Would a £50m town centre office block be a good investment for Blackpool Council? I thought regeneration was suppossed to be for the benefit of the WHOLE comminuity NOT just Blackpool Council. Maybe if the actually spent this money regenerating the parts of Blackpool that need it now and not always spend the biggest majority of it on themselves like they always do, we might get somewhere. This town will get no-where while we have a Council who think this money is best spent regenerating them instead of the rest of Blackpool
7

Seasidesid,

Blackpool 18/07/2008 11:22:00
And what's the choice, this council or the last lot, that allowed the town to get in this mess, in the first place.
8

chrissy21,

18/07/2008 11:28:39
Those sites that Blackpool Council own, Progress, Squires, South King ST, Pru house.

All worth a lot of money. 3 of those sites can be sold off for many many millions for housing developers.
Progress: £20m+, Squires: £15m+, SK ST £2m+ (and Pru £3m+). This is probably under estimated.
So all in all a £10m investment to the Talbot block seems a better way IF it is spent this way.

9

SecretMojoMan,

Blackpool 18/07/2008 12:11:20
Just look at this from an efficiency point of view.

As an example - for the Childrens and Young Peoples Services (Schools etc), HR is managed at progress house, payroll is done at westgate house, yet financial budgeting is done back at Progress house, yet payments are actually done through the town hall! These are deparments that need to communicate effectively yet they're not even in the same building. Just one example and I'm sure you'll find many more. This is an investment that 'should' (I emphasise should!) create better organisational efficiency, save money in transport costs for meetings etc and overall make the council a leaner operation eg at it's most simplistic level every one of the current sites has security/ reception staff etc you'll need less if it's all in one building. Less replication of job roles etc.

10

tjm,

Blackpool 18/07/2008 12:39:30
I the current climate I can"t see any development going ahead.Where will £50m come from?
Prev
1
2 3 4 5

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.