Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

your advert here
Advertise here!
Call 01253 361882 for more information.
 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Controversial firm to end 'scaremongering'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
21 October 2008
CONTROVERSIAL firm Canatxx say they hope to put "irresponsible scaremongering," to an end with a new exhibition of their plans to store gas in Preesall.
The firm have faced furious opposition to their £300m proposal to store natural gas in underground salt caverns near the River Wyre.

But now the American firm say they have addressed the concerns raised by Government planning inspectors when their original application was rejected last November.

At their new exhibition, which opens tomorrow and features a scale model of the site, salt samples as well as explanatory videos, posters and leaflets, Chief Executive Paul Grimes said the firm was ready to put safety fears to rest.

He said: "What we hope is that people will be reasonable and look at the application for what it is, not what they might have heard.
"We know there are people that will never be convinced, but we hope that sense and fairness will prevail.

"Hopefully, people can see that the site will have little effect on their lives, will not be a danger and will not impact on the local environment too much.

"There has been some irresponsible scaremongering, there's no question, but we're confident this application and the exhibition can answer all the issues raised in the planning inspector's report."

Mr Grimes also questioned the Government planning inspectorate stance which questioned the geology of the area.

He said improved consultation with the public, closer working with the Health and Safety Executive and British Geological Survey and peer review of the science behind the application by top UK experts would strengthen their proposal.

Mr Grimes added the site in Preesall would be good for consumers and the UK as a whole, adding as much as 20 per cent to the UK's gas storage capacity.

"There are people in the UK this winter who will be forced to choose between food and fuel," he said.

"This site is the most cost-effective, efficient and best site available in the UK and ultimately the best for the consumer.

"I hope politicians will see that, see how we have addressed safety issues and look out for the consumer."

Four new vertical bore holes are now being drilled to further test underground conditions and the salt gathered and radar scans of the area will provide new data to supplement the application.

Officials and politicians from Wyre Council, Lancashire County Council and other public bodies will visit the exhibition today before it is opened to the wider public tomorrow at Wyre Villa Football Club, Hall Gate Park, Hall Gate Lane, Stalmine between 10am and 8.30pm on Wednesday and Thursday and between 10am and 4.30pm on Friday.

Shuttle buses will also be running from Hambleton, Fleetwood and Thornton.

Bus Schedule
Fleetwood (Euston Crescent opposite the North Euston Hotel)
Departing 10.30am, 12.45pm and 15.00pm
Returning 12.35pm, 14.50pm and 17.05pm

Thornton (Thornton Parish Church car park, Meadow Avenue)
Departing 10.45am, 13.00pm, 15.15pm
Returning 12.20pm, 14.35pm, 16.50pm

Hambleton (Where Kiln Lane meets the A588)
Departing 11am, 13.15pm, 15.30pm
Returning 12.05pm, 14.20pm, 16.35pm

The full article contains 529 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 October 2008 8:33 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
Next
1

spikey mikey,

Sunny Thornton 21/10/2008 12:22:22
What part of "NO" don't Canatxx understand?
2

smifta,

Belchtastic HQ 21/10/2008 14:07:31
Apparantly its perfectly safe! Tell that to residents of two towns in the states where they had massive fires and explosions at similar installations. The issue is and should always be, that the people that have chosen to make the area their home do not want this underground storage. Would you want it near you?
3

JDP,

Blackpool 21/10/2008 17:49:59
Nothing in life is completely safe... however the scheme proposed by Canatxx is a proven technology and poses minimal risk to people.

What is dangerous is having little reserve gas in the UK - much much less than our European neighbours. In under 10 years we will need to import around 80% of our gas from abroad. Should anything happen to distrupt that supply we'll quickly see the nation's lights go out in just a day or two at most (as opposed to the weeks or months of our neighbours). If this were to happen in the dead of winter, people will die!

Make no mistake, to not have this reserve supply puts hundreds or even thousands of people's lives at REAL risk.

[please note: I do not work for, or have any connection to Canatxx]
4

cardy,

blackpool 21/10/2008 17:51:05
its the same old problem people dont want developments on their own doorstep. i dont know about the fires in the u.s.a.but as with anything the u.k. regs are always a lot tougher than any other country in the world, and im sure they will have learnt from the 2 fires as well.how many homes in preesall will actually be affected directly by the site? its not like its a large town or city. how many jobs will be created by the site in this climate of recession?
i dont live in preesall but i dont see a problem i wouldnt object if i did live there we need developments like this for the future
5

Bob Long,

Thornton 21/10/2008 18:02:59
It is still unclear to me just how invasive this installation could be. The comment "won't impact on the environment TOO MUCH" isn't definitive enough.
What will gas stored "underground", stop us building "on" the ground, in the future.
Is this project irrevocably deciding our future options for development?
We are a deprived area commercially, why do we need yet another "project to help the nation".
We are already going to process and recycle vast amounts of waste that doesn't directly belong to us, on the new site at the old ICI.
Let's have something here that's going to make our borough better, wealthier, with a brighter future for the coming generation. Not a legacy of explosive gas under pressure, that they will surely not thank us for!
6

cardy,

blackpool 21/10/2008 20:03:41
i can understand the residents of presall objecting to a new project but throwing in the old ici site to justify your argument does not wash, was ici not there when you bought or moved into your properties. ici is on brown belt land and should be used for industrial/commercial use.
future generations will grow up with the instalation we need these developments for the future.
bob long suggests we are a commercially deprived area then goes on to object to the new developments.helping the nation creates jobs in the local areas and before long we will not be commercially deprived
7

trevron,

marton 21/10/2008 21:17:28
Buy a huge quantity of gas, get a large discount, store it then when the price goes up sell at the new price and make a big profit. Good business sense to me.
8

Ron Allen,

Fleetwood 21/10/2008 23:14:23
Im sorry but we have heard this before just like the sewerage plant 13 years ago we where told it is state of the art and "would not" cause any problems safety will be parramount to the area 13 years down the line we are fighting the smell that covers our town. So forgive us if we don't belevie you. we have given you are reply we said NO before and we will say NO again we the people of wyre will fight "find somewhere else to put your gas"
I fully supprot the comments of Bob Long
9

tonyjames,

22/10/2008 10:57:31
Peple of Preesall unite..Blow up the salt caverns !!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.