Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 9th September 2010

Canatxx pledges to continue fight

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
26 January 2010
CANATXX today pledged it would appeal if its plans to store 1.2 million tonnes of gas under the Wyre countryside were rejected.
Lancashire County Council will rule on the American firm's £300m plans tomorrow.

Local residents are hoping councillors follow the lead of County Hall planning officers by refusing permission to store gas in hollowed-out salt caverns under the River Wyre at Preesall.

But Canatxx bosses delivered a blow to anyone who thought they would throw their hand in following tomorrow's meeting.

They announced they will not give up the fight during a series of presentations to members of County Hall's development control committee ahead of tomorrow's showdown.

Local MPs Joan Humble and Ben Wallace, a representative from Fleetwood Town Council, residents opposing the scheme and a lawyer employed by Canatxx took to the stand for 30 minutes each to argue their case.

Stalmine farmer June Jackson, a long-time opponent of Canatxx, said: "There are so many unknown elements and unknown questions in relation to the brinefield. The salt has not been proven capable of storing gas.

"In October 2007, the Secretary of State agreed with the inspector and refused the application. We believe the reasons are still valid."

Protect Wyre Group (PWG) brought up concerns of gas migration from caverns and the unsuitability of the salt.

Ian Mulroy, chairman of PWG, also showed the committee images of fireballs from an explosion at a gas storage facility in Hutchinson, Kansas, in 2001. He said there were similarities between the Hutchinson salt and that in Preesall.

He said: "The gas seeped and made its way to the surface, causing explosions, fires and fatalities.

"This is dangerous stuff. Canatxx has failed to provide sufficient information to prove without doubt that the Preesall salt is suitable for gas storage. They are in denial."

And Coun Rebecca Murdoch, from Fleetwood Town Council, said: "What would happen if there was an explosion? Fleetwood is a peninsula, it's only got two roads out.

"Where would the 30,000 people go if they had to be evacuated? None of it has been considered in their planning application."

But Patrick Robinson, a planning law specialist in underground storage representing Canatxx, argued there was "a consensus that the UK needs gas storage".

He said: "This contribution of 1.2m tonnes is significant such is the demand we are facing.

Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 26 January 2010 3:25 PM
  • Source: Blackpool Gazette
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Frustrated,

St Annes 26/01/2010 11:59:17
Consensus that we need gas storage is not under dispute. So why isn't the expert saying he can prove this will be safe? On more than one occasion the authorities have refused permission - surely there was a reason and they didn't just think we didn't need to store gas at the time?
2

True Blackpudlian ,

Blackpool 26/01/2010 12:21:40
Why can they not just take NO for an answer. The people of Wyre clearly do not want it and I am not happy about it myself. An accident could realistically wipe out most of the Fylde Coast and accidents have happened with similar schemes before. Just accept when you are beaten Canatxx.

On a similar note though I notice how there is uproar again in Fleetwood when someone actually has plans for Fleetwood Pier. I like Fleetwood but it is a town direly in need of some investment and regeneration. Someone comes up with a good scheme and the NIMBYs try and block it.
3

Frustrated,

St Annes 26/01/2010 13:29:23
Is that still the plan for a hotel on the land with no "pier" as such? If so my only query would be as to who at the moment would want to stay in a hotel in Fleetwood? It has a decimated fishing industry, a few landmarks that are clearly not in their golden age, is a good sight for keeping a boat, but what else at the moment? Regeneration is desperately needed and most importantly jobs for this area but would a hotel work and provide employment? Hopefully government will eventually see that this area deserves better than its got. And lack of good transport links is holding Fleetwood back (even in shipping because the goods then have to get out of Fleetwood).
4

True Blackpudlian ,

Blackpool 26/01/2010 13:39:32
Some good points there, I think one way to improve Fleetwood's transport links is to reopen the Fleetwood-Poulton railway line which I understand is under consideration. New Brighton on the Wirral is a bit like Fleetwood, it is a very nice little town but its main tourist attractions and industry disappeared long ago so the local Council has come up with some exciting plans. But there too the residents for some unknown reason are objecting. I understand where you're coming from but I feel some kind of project is better than just leaving it derelict.
5

Brian Ellis,

Blackpool 26/01/2010 14:35:53
The cat came back, yes the cat came back.
We thought it were a goner, but it couldn’t stay away
The cat came back, the very next day.
6

Grumpma,

26/01/2010 16:23:21
I am one of the 100,000 who say no to Canatxx and we will come back too and will not stand by while cavalier industialists claim what is safe for my family and thousands of others whilst giving no evidence to back their claims.
It is disgraceful that they should be allowed to appeal.If a catastrophe results from the Minister of States approval who takes the blame then....?
7

cabbie2007,

27/01/2010 06:32:21
it is an american company, they do not understand words like no, get lost, we dont want it. eventually they will impose gas storage upon Wyre probably claiming national security. be afraid, be very afraid
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.