Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 9th September 2010

Canatxx gas bid set for rejection

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
21 January 2010
ANTI-Canatxx campaigners have reached a milestone in their fight to stop gas being stored under the River Wyre after County Hall planning officers recommended refusal of the plan.
Planning chiefs say the American firm, which wants to store 1.2 million tonnes of gas in caverns, has failed to provide enough information to ensure the Preesall geology is capable of accommodating the development.

The company has also been criticised for failing to prove gas could not migrate through the geology or via former mining activities.

Concerns were also raised that the £300m development would be "detrimental to the quality of the open character of the countryside, coastal plain, estuary landscape and Wyre Way".

Jubilant MPs and neighbours, who have fought two previous planning applications, welcomed the recommendation and said they now hoped Canatxx would "pack up and go home".

Ian Mulroy, chairman of Protect Wyre Group, said: "We are very pleased and we feel the refusal has been recommended for all the right reasons – because of the lack of information from Canatxx.

"We have still got to go before the committee but we feel confident they will uphold the planning officers' recommendation. Canatxx may pack up and go home now."

The recommendation comes just a week before the county council's development control committee is due to make a decision on the planning application.

For more on this story see Thursday's Gazette.

Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 21 January 2010 8:39 AM
  • Source: Blackpool Gazette
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
2
1

CheeseWeasel,

21/01/2010 08:22:14
And yet HMG has the power to approve the application and given the recent problems of gas supply I think they will probably do just that.
2

HystericalBlackPudding,

21/01/2010 08:43:20
I'm not so sure.
3

Frustrated,

St Annes 21/01/2010 10:24:38
You're probably right Cheese Weasel about the government potentially making this go through - but it shouldn't on safety risks.
Would I like more gas storage? Yes. Do I think it should go ahead when there's a risk to the residents of Over Wyre? Definitely not.
4

Danny M,

21/01/2010 10:40:36
So where should it be stored?

We have gas storage by Mereside but no one objects to that, why? Because it's besides a council estate?

5

kaillum,

21/01/2010 10:46:41
DannyM

There are no objections to gas storage near Mereside because its stored in purpose made metal containers!

Canatxx want to store the gas underground in holes in the salt!

Store it where you want! Just use pupose built storage containers.. not in the earths breathing holes!
6

CheeseWeasel,

21/01/2010 10:54:05
TBH, I think it would be safer in a hole in the ground than in a gasometer.
7

Frustrated,

St Annes 21/01/2010 11:02:48
I think purpose built containers may well be safer. Once it's underground if it escapes who will notice until it is too late. With the mining activities there's a greater risk of it seeping somewhere inaccessible and hard to correct. In a container we can see where it is, easily check that there's no leaks and if it does explode there's less risk of the explosion source being very wide.
What I don't understand is why this gas (if the storage facility goes ahead) will then be piped to Anglesey to be treated). Surely the place benefitting from the employment the storage brings should be fairly near the actual storage which brings no benefits in itself? And somewhere fairly remote where no-one lives is the ideal area for gas storage - not Mereside, but it's already there.
8

HystericalBlackPudding,

21/01/2010 11:32:43
Test
9

CheeseWeasel,

21/01/2010 11:33:59
Of course the hole has to be properly prepared...


10

,

21/01/2010 11:53:37
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.