Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 9th September 2010

Battlelines drawn for Canatxx finale

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
26 November 2009
BATTLELINES have been drawn in the final fight to store more than a million tonnes of gas under Wyre's countryside.
More than 8,500 campaigners have now joined the protest against Canatxx's proposals – as the date for the long-awaited decision is revealed.

In just over two months – on January 27 – Lancashire County Council will hold a special meeting to discuss the American firm's proposals to build a £300m, 1.2m tonne gas storage facility in Preesall under the River Wyre.

Up to now, just 97 letters of support have been received.

Ian Mulroy, chairman of Protect Wyre Group, said: "We are more confident than ever the evidence against Canatxx will be sufficient for the application to be dismissed.

"We can accept that no-one sets out to cause an accident or a disaster but most of the fires and explosions we hear about concerning gas storage and escapes are caused by unplanned and unforeseen accidents."

Long-time campaigner June Jackson believes the huge fight launched against the plans is big enough to get the result they want.

Mrs Jackson, a Stalmine farmer, said: "8,500 objections is a good figure. I'm feeling very positive.

"Canatxx haven't answered the Secretary of State's concerns. We are ready for the fight."

And Joan Humble, Blackpool North and Fleetwood MP, said: "Our message to Canatxx is 'No' and I hope LCC will join us in this.

"My constituents are still very concerned about the safety issues and I believe Preesall is the wrong place for this development."

A Canatxx spokesman added: "Canatxx, alongside the independent British Geological Survey and other world-renowned experts in gas storage, have presented the most extensive database of information ever produced for a project of this nature.

"Quite simply, the science proves Preesall salt is perfectly suitable for the storage of gas.

"We welcome the news that the council plan to determine the application on January 27 and we will continue to work tirelessly to provide the council with all of the information they require to make an informed decision."

And Canatxx chief executive Paul Grimes has previously said: "The caverns cannot blow up, they cannot collapse, they are inherently safe."

Representations on the Canatxx planning application can be made up until the date of the meeting.

For the full story, see Thursday's Gazette.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 November 2009 2:25 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

Bill R,

Blackpool 26/11/2009 15:18:56
Am I right in thinking that the storage of gas in this country is not necessary storage just for our own use.
Owing to the fact that the gas stored is no longer the property of the British Government and so can be stored here for these companies to use anywhere they think the biggest profit's can be made. In conclusion we get the risk , the hassle but not necessarily the contents of these facilities. If what I say is true, has this been brought up at any of the public or private meetings?
2

Brian Ellis,

Blackpool 26/11/2009 15:52:41
To the person who keeps deleting our postings. Please do not delete these posts, this is a very serious topic.

3

Brian Ellis,

Blackpool 26/11/2009 15:57:47
How very nice and comforting to read that these salt caverns can't blow-up and that they are "inherently safe."

I am almost certain that no one has stated or implied these caverns will spontaneously blow-up, or collapse for that matter. However the gas stored within the walls of these caverns CAN blow-up, causing the caverns to collapse.

This is called semantics. These people at Canatxx must think we are all stupid or at least brain-dead.
4

CheeseWeasel,

26/11/2009 16:01:49
I'm still open to persuasion... I am not a geologist, but I am an engineer so I am fairly able to analyse technical data. The problem I see from both sides of this argument is that there is an awful lot of assertion and counter assertion with little in the way of fact. The vote on the right is not as clear as the nay sayers would have us believe it should be. I suppose it is possible that Mr Canatxx has ordered all his staff to vote...
The worst thing about this is the name of the company.
5

CheeseWeasel,

26/11/2009 16:04:12
Now Brian, you must surely know that the gas cannot blow up without the presence of oxygen. Where does that come into the equation? This is what I mean about assertion getting in the way of facts.
6

Brian Ellis,

Blackpool 26/11/2009 16:11:55
No one can be certain these caverns are airtight, and the ground has been know to slip.
7

CheeseWeasel,

26/11/2009 16:38:55
Brian,
the biggest risk is not a chamber blowing up, but ignition of leaked gas. Now I know that this is not a very good thing to happen - it is in effect a fuel air explosive, which the military uses to make the biggest bangs without going nuclear. There is probably a far greater risk of this happening at a rusty old gasometer than a hole in the ground storage facility.

Don't get me wrong, if the plan is chucked out for objective health and safety issues, that's fine by me but I'd rather have gas in a hole in the ground than a new reactor at Heysham. Now that does worry me.
8

Colm Ulysees Nigel Tarrant,

26/11/2009 17:12:47
WBC support this plan.
9

CheeseWeasel,

26/11/2009 17:21:04
Good grief! That didn't take long...
10

G7VEW,

Ireland 26/11/2009 17:38:02

I received a good email from the Gazette today,
assuring me that it is not them deleting the posts.

They are tracing the malicious deleter's IP address.

They will restore all posts as soon as they can.

Meanwhile, any hackers out there?
Serious damage can be done to this pest's computers.
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.