Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

your advert here
Advertise here!
Call 01253 361882 for more information.
 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Blackpool Gazette site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Anger at tax 'con' plan by town hall



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 February 2008
OPPONENTS to Fylde Council's controversial taxation proposals have slammed the plans as a "stealth tax" and a "con".
Differential taxation is a new method of taxation which town hall finance chiefs reckon will save the floundering authority £270,000.

The scheme will see parish councils take charge of open spaces and other non-essential council services and charg
e a fee for them in council tax bills.

But the borough council – which is set to increase council tax by 4.99 per cent this year – will keep government funding which would usually be spent on maintaining such amenities.

The new plan is set to be passed by Fylde Council's cabinet before going in front of the full council.

Fylde Council leader, Coun John Coombes, admits the plans are a new method of charging taxpayers more without breaching the Government's five per cent capping rate. He insists residents in some areas have been "getting away" with cheaper taxes for years.

But Coun Liz Oades, leader of the opposition, believes many parishes will be angry at the plan.

She added: "The town and parish councils will be charging for parks and cleaning the streets, but unless Fylde lower their rates people are going to be paying for the same services twice."

Council tax campaigner Fred Moor of St Annes said: "The council is trying to con money to bypass the Government's five per cent cap on council tax.

"They are saying that things like Ashton Gardens, Lowther Gardens, Fairhaven Lake are in those areas and only used by people in those areas whereas they are used by people throughout Fylde and visitors to the area.

"It's like saying only Londoners should pay for all the museums in the capital because they are only used by residents when everyone knows they are more used by visitors.

"They are looking at doing this because they are in such a mess with a massive hole in their budget. If they do try to bring this in we will challenge the legality of it."

But Coun Coombes reckons those in areas with more services have been paying less tax than they should.

He added: "All we have done is right an accounting error which has existed for 34 years.

"People in rural areas have been paying too much for that period.

"Some areas have been getting away with it and getting services cheaper."

With Differential Taxation, residents in Kirkham would see an extra £25 put on their bill while those living in Elswick face a £30 hike.

However, there would be some winners with people in Staining coming out around £19 better off.

As revealed in Saturday's Gazette, Fylde's public swimming pools in Kirkham and St Annes are set for closure. One may be saved but that would put other amenities such as Lowther Gardens or Fairhaven Lake under threat.

Even with Differential Taxation, the pools are still under threat, but council bosses hope that by bringing it in they will not have to start cutting other essential services.



The full article contains 510 words and appears in Blackpool Gazette newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 February 2008 7:56 AM
  • Source: Blackpool Gazette
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Frustrated,

St Annes 11/02/2008 12:11:46
The argument for differential taxation does not stand up. Lytham residents cannot be charged it and larger areas whilst having more facilities also have a lot more residents which provide the funds for these services via their council tax. If £1 of everyone's bill goes to these services clearly an larger area provides more money for these spaces than a smaller one. Also the cost of collecting rubbish and so on is usually cheaper per household due to the physical proximity of the properties.

Fylde needs to be one united borough where all residents needs are satisfied no matter which part of the borough they choose to live in. Perhaps if the council collected rents from their properties instead of selling them (the receipts from which cannot be used for services) then maybe the books could be more easily balanced? If the pools, Fairhaven Lake and Low Gardens are not essential surely a new town hall funded by asset sales isn't either.
2

beachcomber,

blackpool 11/02/2008 12:47:37
sounds like fylde council have totally lost control
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.