Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 30th July 2010

£800m turbine plans rejected

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
07 November 2008
PLANS to build an £800m windfarm off the Fylde coast have been blown out of the water.
The controversial proposals for Shell Flat windfarm would have seen turbines larger than Blackpool Tower just three miles off the coast of
Fleetwood.

But developers Cirrus Energy have pulled out of the project after failing to overcome objections about air safety.

The news brings relief for Fleetwood fishermen who would have lost one of their main fishing grounds.

An array of between 60 and 90 turbines were planned off Fleetwood's coastline but would have interfered with test flying from BAE systems at Warton.

A Cirrus spokesman said: "The project team has put a great deal of effort into addressing concerns raised both on the original Shell Flat Site and the subsequent application for cirrus Shell Flat Array.

"Unfortunately, despite these efforts and the relocation of the site in 2005 to overcome concerns about birds, it has not been possible to resolve underlying concerns about aviation and the project is therefore discontinued."

BAE Systems and the MOD lodged objections to the windfarm early in 2007 but it has been dogged by controversy from the moment it was found it was on the winter feeding ground of one of Britain's rarest ducks, the common scoter.

Objections from the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and English nature led to the project being moved further north to the Fleetwood site. Even then Blackpool International Airport lodged complaints their radar system would be affected.

A spokesman for BAE Systems said they had worked with Cirrus to try to find a solution to the problems the wind turbines would cause for the Warton radar.

He added: "The sheer physical obstruction that a network of up to 90 turbines, at a maximum height of 177m, would make an already poor situation unacceptable.

"It would effectively be removing 27 sq kms of low flying test space in an area progressively constrained by the needs of commercial aviation.

"The safety of aircrew and our local residents must remain absolutely paramount."

Fleetwood inshore fisherman Mike Porter said: "I'm glad but there are still lots of other problems for us.

"There are so many developments going on out there with gas storage and other windfarms that they are going to put us out of business."

He said the Government should give the inshore fleet help to move to different grounds which would need different types of boats.

Blackpool North and Fleetwood MP Joan Humble added: "I know that Fleetwood fishermen expressed very serious concerns about the possible impact on fishing effort in that area. They will be relieved this project is no longer going ahead."

Cirrus put their first application in for Shell Flat in January 2003 when the site was 20 miles off Cleveleys and Blackpool. The new site was in deeper water and only part of it touched the Shell Flat sandbank.

Sue Kendrick from Blackpool International said: "We lodged an objection to the proposal in February 2007. At no point did we receive any feedback from our concerns about the project and were surprised to learn the proposals have now been withdrawn.

"We objected to the proposal because of its adverse effect on radar performance which is of paramount importance."

Blackpool Council leader Peter Callow joins a live web chat at 1pm today to answer your questions and talk about his plans for the town's future. Click here to join in

What do you think about these plans, should they have been rejected? Leave your comments below.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 November 2008 9:34 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
2
1

Fleetwoodandproud,

07/11/2008 10:49:31
Great isn't it...., rejection from Blackpool, then Cleveleys...., now Fleetwood; Where next Knott-End?

Cirrus, no means NO!
2

overwyrer,

07/11/2008 10:51:58
We need them somewhere!
3

Fleetwoodandproud,

07/11/2008 10:55:34
Stick them in Preesall then!
4

tonyjames,

07/11/2008 11:01:35
One of the best skylines in the north west in a major beauty spot and an area of national importance for wild life and they seriously want to plant 90 turbines in the way.?

This is WAY out of control. These turbines are the most unpopular thing since speed cameras and need to go. Give me nuclear.
5

tonyjames,

07/11/2008 11:02:49
Ove wyrer -
I can think of a place you can put your wind turbines!?
6

Fleetwoodandproud,

07/11/2008 11:10:48
In the same cavern he can put the noxious Canataxx methane!
7

overwyrer,

07/11/2008 11:52:18
tee hee. I don't agree with Canataxx. I don't believe it's safe. I think we should build some turbines, surely one day gas will run out and we need alternatives.
8

Idea,

07/11/2008 12:03:24
How about knocking down the "hotels" / "guesthouses" behing the Foxhall & putting them there - would make that part of town a lot better looking. (TIC / LOL)
9

Charles Rittercolm,

Fleetwood 07/11/2008 12:12:02
Its a no brainer if safety issues cannot be resolved. The principle of turbines or any other measures which help reduce a reliance on the use of fossil fuel should be embraced.
10

Pete H,

Fleetwood 07/11/2008 12:27:16
Ask Joey Blower if you can put one on the land that used to be the pier !!!
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.