Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Broomheads
For 27 years - your Property,
Mortgage and Life Insurance needs
 
 
Tuesday, 19th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

"Great Wall of Fleetwood" row



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 May 2008
IT is a wall that has divided a community - in more ways than one.
This towering structure - dubbed the "Great Wall of Fleetwood" - has sparked anger and threats of court action in the escalation of a neighbours' dispute.

And now locals - one describing the situation as like living in a "concrete prison" - are demanding Wyre Council takes action to get it torn down.

"People are calling it the Great Wall of Fleetwood, but I'd rather it was like the Berlin Wall and came down," said fuming next door neighbour Dennis Hawes.

Upset

The 16ft wall looms over his garden in the most select area of Fleetwood where homes have views over the golf course.

Mr Hawes has been battling for more than 12 months to get the wall on Princes Way taken down.

But before there is any chance of the matter being resolved it must be discussed by councillors.

Mr Hawes said: "This wall must have breached every planning rule going.
"It has to be dangerous and it's completely out of keeping with the area. Everyone's upset about it, one neighbour has said it's like living in a concrete prison.

"It's OK to have a wall around your house, but not one so overbearing as this. It's rendered on his side but not on mine, it's just breeze blocks."

Mr Hawes said problems begun when he built a sun deck alongside his house which overlooks the garden of his neighbour Charles Hart.

"My neighbour said he didn't like it and for harmony I wouldn't have done it if he had mentioned it earlier," said Mr Hawes.

Mr Hart got permission for part of the wall to protect his privacy. He is then said to have extended it a further four metres, the complete length of Mr Hawes' garden.

Among those angry about the wall is Joan Groves who lives in nearby Ridgeway.

She said: "I can see it from my landing window. I think it's an eyesore. I wouldn't like it to be next door to me."

Peggy Chamber, 84, of Westgate, whose garden backs onto Mr Hawes' property, said: "It's terrible."

Wyre Council officials said they were ready to go to court to have the wall removed.

But Mr Hart has now put in a fresh planning application offering to take two metres off the length of the wall.

A Wyre Council spokesman said: "We are waiting for the decision of the planning committee in June.

"If the application is rejected we would then proceed with enforcement action and take it the matter to court. If that action is successful he will be forced to take it down."

Mr Hart was unavailable for comment.

The full article contains 451 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 May 2008 11:15 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
2
1

,

10/05/2008 10:18:22
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

walker of fells,

fylde 10/05/2008 10:49:41
I can see your point Blackpool man...squabaling over a wall may seem trivial compared to peoples problems elsewhere in the world..... but if it's causing the chap stress then it's a problem, and to be honest if somebody built a wall that high next to my garden i wouldn't be happy either as i'm sure the majority of people wouldn't be!! I don't think you could do anything to make a wall so high look better in your garden, the original issue was the sun decking.....this should have been addressed before it esculated and resulting in a wall that looks hidious being built. It would probably put most people of buying the property if it was to go up for sale. The wall should be taken down and a different solution found to the problem of the sun decking.
3

,

10/05/2008 10:59:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

True Blackpudlian ,

Blackpool 10/05/2008 11:49:26
Why has my comment been removed? There was nothing wrong with it.
5

TangerineBoy,

Blackpool 10/05/2008 12:37:38
Why is Mr Hawes portrayed as the victim and Mr Hart the bad guy. This is a dispute between neighbours which has got out of hand. Yes Mr hart has gone over the top but did not Mr Hawes think he might object to have someone staring in at him.

If Mr Hart got permission to build part of the wall then someone must have agreed that the sun deck was an invasion of his privacy so I have some sympathy for Mr Hart although the height is excessive.

The wall should be reduced to that what was agreed and if Mr Hawes is still not happy with that he should remove his sun deck.

6

,

10/05/2008 12:52:35
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
7

cjack,

Poulton 10/05/2008 12:53:32
These are called "Spite Walls".
The best example I have seen is in Silverdale where one was built in Victorian timnes. It is nearly the full height of the large house adjacent to it.
8

disgusted NANAOF5@BTINTERNET.COM,

10/05/2008 13:24:13
hell fire ; its an awful eyesore ;
9

,

10/05/2008 14:43:44
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
10

dwain dibley,

10/05/2008 15:15:53
i suppose if the wall comes down then so will the sun deck?
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.