Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 3rd September 2010

£100m tram bid hits the buffers

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
12 January 2010
THE £100m revamp of Blackpool's tram network has hit the buffers after the Government ordered an 11th hour review of the plans.
THE £100m revamp of Blackpool's tram network has hit the buffers after the Government ordered an 11th hour review of the plans.

Council leaders today admitted they fear for the future of the famous seafront service after the Government announced it is to probe the siting of a controversial new depot at Starr Gate.

In a dramatic turn of events, the "call in" notice was made just two minutes before councillors were due to approve planning permission.

Local residents have fought a fierce campaign against Blackpool Council plans which they say will be detrimental to the local environment and their own homes.

Council leader Peter Callow said: "Any delay could spell the end of the line for trams in Blackpool, which is unthinkable. I can't understand why the Government would call in the decision and delay it, when they have invested £75m in it.

"I will be contacting the Transport Minister, Saddique Khan, today to make sure there is no delay.

"Blackpool has the longest unbroken history of trams, and I'm glad both Labour and Conservatives voted for it to be approved. It's just unfortunate it has to be referred."

The depot – which will house a fleet of 16 supertrams, a tram wash, and car parking – is currently under construction.

The plans were approved in June but, in November, a court found the council had not met environmental screening rules.

The authority was forced to make a fuller assessment of environmental impact and resubmit the application.

Starr Gate Residents Association, who employed a lawyer to take the council to court, said the authority had flouted planning regulations.

During last night's Town Hall meeting, planning officer Gary Johnson revealed: "I got a call two minutes before the meeting, telling me Government Office North West was preparing an Article 14 direction, meaning whatever the council's decision, it has to be referred to the Government Office.

"They said this was to ensure we have a clean set of hands, after the oversights last time."

The meeting went on to approve the scheme but the decision must now be examined by central government.

The council has a funding deadline of Easter 2012 from central government and requires the tram depot up and running by May 2011.

Coun Callow has previously warned the authority would face a "funding risk" if it could not deliver on time.

However, Blackpool South MP Gordon Marsden said government involvement was important to assure transparency.

And he said he could see no reason for the call in to be a major obstacle or create a lengthy delay.

He said: "Nobody wants to see a delay that would hold up this vitally important scheme for Blackpool.

"Residents have put a strong and robust case and it's important all views are looked at dispassionately before a decision is made.

"What I would like to see in the interim is the council undertake a more proactive consultation and let's see if an amicable resolution can be achieved."

Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 13 January 2010 7:19 AM
  • Source: Blackpool Gazette Fleetwood
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
2 3 4 5 6 7
1

Summer62,

13/01/2010 07:50:10
Blackpool South MP Gordon Marsden said government involvement was important to assure transparency. Why? Transparency is not something this government care about!
2

,

13/01/2010 08:03:58
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
3

geezer466,

13/01/2010 08:22:38
Given the state of the public finances this was always on the cards!!
Sadly this is just the start. No project or public sector jobs will be safe after the election!!

Bad news for Blackpool though....... And just serves to show the lack of joined up thinking in allowing £75 million already to be spent!!
4

billy hunt,

blackpool 13/01/2010 08:23:04
1 nill to the nimbys !!! and another nail in blackpools coffin ? pleasure beach going from bad to worse ,the recession , blackpool needs a boost. and i think the trams would help , aslong as its not in my backyard thats fine ? a case of .... you im ok
5

Miss Jan,

13/01/2010 08:32:18
Oh dear doesn't look good, People here don't seem to like progress, Starr Gate front ain't much of a residential area in the first place so I can't see the problem. Getting Government intervention now has probably sealed the fate as the South don't like the North as a competitor. Well Done SGRA.
6

tangokev,

Blackpool 13/01/2010 08:49:09
It is a sad fact that whenever there is an attempt to improve Blackpool there are protests to try to stop it. Sadly the protestors have again stepped in and at what financial cost is their actions to the tax paying residents? MP Marsden should get behind Blackpool and not hinder progress. The depot and all that goes with it is far more attractive than the go cart track, an essential to the future of the resort. The addresses of protetors should be checked too, to establish if they actually live near to the site!
7

ZimFlyer,

13/01/2010 09:11:17
These Nimby's must not be allowed to win. This town was built with "progress" in mind by people like John Bickerstaffe.

If these Nimby's have 20K to spend, let them spend it on a charity in Blackpool rather than trying to derail one of Blackpool's great regeneration projects.
8

Philtheone,

South Shore 13/01/2010 09:22:00
The Government blocked the plans, not the residents.
9

Philtheone,

South Shore 13/01/2010 09:31:42
Be nice if they got Sadiq Khan's name right too.
10

cabbie2007,

13/01/2010 09:50:35
they have still never said what was wrong with modernising the current tram sheds
Prev
1
2 3 4 5 6 7

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.